Pro-life, Pro-Choice and everything in between: A quantitative study of popular attitudes on abortion in the Faroe Islands Ímillum Frítt Val og Pro Vita: Ein kvantitativ kanning um fólksligan hugburð til abort í Føroyum
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7982-8908
Herit Albinus
Abstract
Having debated the rights of sexual minorities for two decades, the question of abortion is increasingly emerging as a new fault line in Faroese politics. In spring of 2024, the Faroese Parliament rejected the legalisation of free abortion by the slimmest margin possible, and civil society NGOs are spearheading “pro-choice” and “pro-life” campaigns. But how does the Faroese voter relate to the question? Who supports and who opposes the legalisation of free abortion before week twelve? On the basis of a quantitative survey conducted in November 2022, this article examines public opinion on abortion legislation and what demographic and personal factors predict abortion attitudes. While it is not possible to present conclusive evidence on the basis of one single study, the findings indicate that the Faroese public is divided on the issue. Furthermore, there is a positive correlation between pro-life attitudes and the importance of religion as well as right-wing attitudes, while centre-periphery tensions are also visible. However, and in contrast with international surveys in the cross-national literature on abortion and public opinion, the survey finds no difference between men and women, and educational level does not predict abortion attitudes either. Finally, when examining the role of age, the generation between 30-44 years proves most likely to oppose the legalisation of abortion on demand.
Úrtak
Eftir at hava kjakast um rættindi hjá seksuellum minnilutum í tvey áratíggju er ósemjan um abort ella fosturtøku vorðin alsamt sjónligari í føroyskum politikki. Á vári í 2024 atkvøddi ein tepur meiriluti ímóti nýggjari lóg, sum loyvir fríari fosturtøku, samstundis sum felagsskapir stríðast bæði fyri og ímóti rættinum til abort. Men hvat hugsar føroyski veljarin um hendan spurning? Hvør er fyri og hvør er ímóti fríari abort áðrenn 12. viku? Við støði í kvantitativari kanning frá november 2022 kannar hendan greinin almennan hugburð til abort og hvørji demografisk og persónlig viðurskifti mynda hugburð til hendan spurning. Uttan at draga ov greiðar niðurstøður við støði í einstøkum kanningum geva úrslitini ábendingar um, at føroyskir veljarar eru sera ósamdir. Hagfrøðiliga finst ein signifikantur samanhangur millum átrúnað, høgravendan hugburð og mótstøðu ímóti fríari abort, samstundis sum munirnir millum miðstaðarøkið og økini kring landið eisini eru sjónligir. Men í andsøgn til gransking aðrastaðni finst eingin signifikantur munur á monnum og kvinnum, og útbúgving hevur heldur ongan týdning. Viðvíkjandi aldri er aldursbólkurin millum 30 og 44 ár í størri mun ímóti fríari abort samanborið við aðrar aldursbólkar.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Abortion, public opinion, demography, ideology, religion, secularisation, Fosturtøka, almennur hugburður, demografi, ideologi, átrúni, sekularisering
Adamczyk, A., Kim, C., & Dillon, L. (2020). Examining public opinion about abortion: a mixed‐methods systematic review of research over the last 15 years. Sociological Inquiry, 90(4), 920-954.
Barkan, S. E. (2014). Gender and abortion attitudes: Religiosity as a suppressor variable. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(4), 940-950.
Brysk, A., & Yang, R. (2023). Abortion Rights Attitudes in Europe: Pro-Choice, Pro-Life, or Pro-Nation? Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 30(2), 525-555.
Center for Reproductive Rights. (2013). “The world’s abortion laws”. Link: https://reproductiverights.org/maps/worlds-abortion-laws/
Damian, C. I. (2010). Abortion from the perspective of eastern religions: Hinduism and Buddhism. Revista Romana de Bioetica, 8(1), 124-136.
Davie, G. (2013). The sociology of religion: A critical agenda. The Sociology of Religion, 1-328.
Davie, G., Heelas, P., & Woodhead, L. (Eds.). (2017). Predicting religion: Christian, secular and alternative futures. Taylor & Francis.
Durkheim, É. (1897). De la définition des phénomènes religieux. L’Année sociologique (1896/1897-1924/1925), 2, 1-28.
Durkheim, E. (1912). The elementary forms of religious life. In W. Longhofer & D. Winchester (Eds.), Social theory re-wired (pp. 52-67). Routledge.
Dutta, N., Giddings, L., & Sobel, R. (2021). Attitudes towards abortion: what role do educational attainment and cultural traits play? Review of Social Economy, 1-24.
Espinosa, C. (2014). The advocacy of the previously inconceivable: A discourse analysis of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth at Rio+ 20. The Journal of Environment & Development, 23(4), 391-416.
Florida, R. E. (1991). Buddhist approaches to abortion. Asian Philosophy, 1(1), 39-50.
Hagstova Føroya (2023), BTÚ og høvuðstøl, retrieved at: https://hagstova.fo/fo/buskapur/tjodarbuskapur/btu-og-hovudstol
Hanschmidt, F., Linde, K., Hilbert, A., Riedel‐Heller, S. G., & Kersting, A. (2016). Abortion stigma: a systematic review. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 48(4), 169-177.
í Skorini, H., & Albinus, H (2021). Pandemien i Nordatlanten: Hvordan covid-19 har forenet en polariseret mikronation–og hvordan velkendte konflikter stadig ulmer. Politica, 54(4), 364-388.
Imber, J. B. (2012). Fetal rights. In T. Cushman (Ed.), Handbook of Human Rights (pp. 384-388 x-x). Routledge.
Inglehart, R. F. (2020). Religion's sudden decline: What's causing it, and what comes next?. Oxford University Press.
Ishay, M. (2008). The history of human rights: From ancient times to the globalization era. Univ of California Press.
Jelen, T. G. (2014). The subjective bases of abortion attitudes: a cross national comparison of religious traditions. Politics and Religion, 7(3), 550-567.
Jelen, T. G., & Wilcox, C. (2003). Causes and consequences of public attitudes toward abortion: A review and research agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 489-500.
Kringvarp Føroya (2023), Breddin: Fosturtøkulógin, retrieved at: https://kvf.fo/breddin?sid=164031
Loll, D., & Hall, K. S. (2019). Differences in abortion attitudes by policy context and between men and women in the World Values Survey. Women & health, 59(5), 465-480.
Lov nr. 177 af 23. juni 1956 om foranstaltninger i anledning af svangerskab m.v., sum seinast broytt við løgtingslóg nr. 168 frá 16. desember 2021. Retrieved at: https://logir.fo/Lov/177-fra-23-06-1956-nr-177-af-23-juni-1956-om-foranstaltninger-i-anledning
Moyn, S. (2011). The last utopia: human rights in history. Harvard University Press.
Nepstad S., Erickson R. H. Williams, (2007). Religion in rebellion, resistance and social movements. In: J. A. Beckford & J. Demerath (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of the Sociology of Religion (pp. 419-437). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Osborne, D., Huang, Y., Overall, N. C., Sutton, R. M., Petterson, A., Douglas, K. M., & Sibley, C. G. (2022). Abortion attitudes: An overview of demographic and ideological differences. Political Psychology, 43, 29-76.
Pushaw Jr, R. J. (2023). Defending Dobbs: Ending the Futile Search for a Constitutional Right to Abortion. San Diego L. Rev., 60, 265.
Rehnström Loi, U., Gemzell-Danielsson, K., Faxelid, E., & Klingberg-Allvin, M. (2015). Health care providers’ perceptions of and attitudes towards induced abortions in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia: A systematic literature review of qualitative and quantitative data. BMC public health, 15(1), 1-13.
Shapiro, G. K. (2014). Abortion law in Muslim-majority countries: An overview of the Islamic discourse with policy implications. Health policy and planning, 29(4), 483-494.
Skorini, H. í., Albinus, H., & Sølvará, H. A. (2022). Færøerne mellem religiøs vækkelse og sekularisering: En nordisk undtagelse bliver til. Økonomi & Politik, 95(1), 88-110.
Stack, S., Adamczyk, A., & Cao, L. (2010). Survivalism and public opinion on criminality: A cross-national analysis of prostitution. Social Forces, 88(4), 1703-1726.
Van den Akker, H., Van der Ploeg, R., & Scheepers, P. (2013). Disapproval of homosexuality: Comparative research on individual and national determinants of disapproval of homosexuality in 20 European countries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(1), 64-86.
Woodhead, L. (2007). Gender differences in religious practice and significance. In J. A. Beckford & J. Demerath (Eds.), The Sage handbook of the sociology of religion (pp. 566-586). Sage Publications.
Yam, E. A., Dries‐Daffner, I., & García, S. G. (2006). Abortion opinion research in Latin America and the Caribbean: a review of the literature. Studies in family planning, 37(4), 225-240.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.