https://ojs.setur.fo/index.php/flr/issue/feedFøroyskt lógarrit - Faroese Law Review2023-01-13T13:48:03+00:00Open Journal Systemshttps://ojs.setur.fo/index.php/flr/article/view/738Eru Cookoyggjar og Niue statir eftir altjóðarætti?2023-01-13T12:18:54+00:00Kristian Joensenkristianj@setur.fo<p><strong>Úrtak</strong></p> <p>Henda greinin viðger spurningin um statshugtakið við serligum atliti til um Cookoyggjar og Niue eru statir eftir altjóðarætti. Høvundurin førir fram, at spurningurin, um Cookoyggjar og Niue eru statir, kann bý tast í fýra undirspurningar, um londini eru statir de-jure ella de-facto eftir ávíkavist altjó ðarætti og stjó rnarrætti. Víðari førir høvundurin fram, at svarið valdast, um spurt verður ú tfrá sjó narhorninum á antin deklaratorisku ella konstitutivu fatanini av, hvønn tý dning viðurkenning frá øðrum statum hevur á statshugtakið.</p> <p><strong>Abstract </strong></p> <p>This essay examines the topic of statehood exemplified by the question of whether the Cook Islands and Niue are states according to international law. The author posits that the question of statehood with respect to these two territories can be categorized into four sub-questions: whether or not they have respectively de-facto or de-jure statehood under either international law or constitutional law. The author further argues that the answer depends on wheter you take the declaratory view or the contitutive view on the importance of state recognition.</p>2023-01-01T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2023 Føroyskt lógarrit - Faroese Law Reviewhttps://ojs.setur.fo/index.php/flr/article/view/739Oddagrein2023-01-13T13:48:03+00:00Bárður Atlason Ísheimfsj@setur.fo<p>Greinarnar í hesi ú tgá vuni umrøða hugtakið ló g ú r trimum ymiskum sjó narhornum.</p>2023-01-01T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2023 Føroyskt lógarrit - Faroese Law Review